QUALITY ASSURANCE MODEL OF UNITED KINGDOM

QUALITY ASSURANCE MODEL OF UNITED KINGDOM

 

Introduction:

 

In this paper I want to show the UK model of Quality Assurance based on my own 18 years of experience in higher Education at College Level. It mostly focuses on the implementation side.

 

Brief Background:

 

Due to the change in the government funding, we were obliged to address our quality system. The government was insisting on quality education therefore there was immense pressure from the media, public, unions, politician and parliament agenda (White paper).   This change was our wake up call.

 

Our educational institution had files and files of policies and procedures for all aspect of our day to day running. I can guarantee that almost (99.9%) of the staff had not read it or knew about the content of these files. We did not have systematic checking procedures, therefore our policies and procedures were not implemented in practice.

 

Steps taken:

The first thing we started with was re-designing and rewriting the policies and procedures that are fit for our purpose and adapt to how we actually do things. It was difficult to implement the quality, as there was not a share of understanding across the organization on what we were seeking to achieve.

 

The importance of offering number of workshops, meetings at different levels (individual, groups and all organization) were vital to our success in implementing the quality assurance. We re-educated the staff, brought new procedures, we experience resistance to change but we over came it with:

Communication
Constant staff support
Role models
Mentoring
Visiting lecturer
Consultant
Investment in training and staff development
Investment in software and hardware

 

We reassessed our technical infrastructure to define the capability of implementing our policy.  We had to ensure that we had a systematic checking procedure to ensure that our policies are being implemented, so we kept an audit trail to record result of checking procedure. This helped us to spot trends, which may indicate procedure failure. We also appointed a new member of staff to carry the audit trail and with the given responsibility as a quality manager.

 

Staffs were encouraged to attend external workshops and seminars on quality assurance, so that they could learn from other organization and share experience of effective quality assurance procedure. On their return they gave their feedback on the intranet and discussed it in monthly meeting.

 

When setting teacher target we used the three R which are Recruitment, Retention and Result

 

Learning Inspectorate:

 

Inspections are carried out by the Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted) and the Adult learning Inspectorate (ALI).

 

Their purpose:

They are intended to ensure that:

the findings of the inspection are valid
the findings of inspection contribute to improvement
the process of inspection promotes inclusion
Inspection is carried out openly with those being inspected.

 

How they operate:

These reviews will evaluate the extent to which for each area the following five outcomes for children and young people are being met:

Being healthy
Staying safe
Enjoying and achieving
Making a positive contribution
Achieving economic well-being.

Overall effectiveness

How effective and efficient are the provision and related services in meeting the full range of learners’ needs and why?
What steps need to be taken to improve the provision further?

 

Inspectors should evaluate:

the overall effectiveness of the provision, including any extended services, and its main strengths and weaknesses
the capacity to make further improvements
the effectiveness of any steps taken to promote improvement since the last inspection

 

and, where appropriate,

the effectiveness of links with other organisations to promote the well-being of learners
the quality and standards in the Foundation Stage
the effectiveness and efficiency of the sixth form.

The common grading scale for all inspection judgements

A common grading scale will be used in making judgements for institutional inspection and for judgements relating to the five outcomes assessed for Joint Area Reviews.

 

Grade 1     Outstanding

Grade 2     Good

Grade 3     Satisfactory

Grade 4     Inadequate

 

What are their standards?

 

This Common Inspection Framework meets the requirements of theLearning and Skills Act 2000.

 

 


I.  Achievement and standards

How well do learners achieve?

Inspectors should evaluate:

learners’ success in achieving challenging targets, including qualifications and learning goals, with trends over time, and any significant variations between groups of learners (3)
the standards of learners’ work in relation to their learning goals (3)
learners’ progress relative to their prior attainment and potential, with any significant variations between groups of learners (3)
the extent to which learners enjoy their work (3)

 

and, where appropriate,

the acquisition of workplace skills (4,5)
the development of skills which contribute to the social and economic well-being of the learner (2,4,5)
the emotional development of learners (1)
the behaviour of learners (1,2)
the attendance of learners (2,3)
the extent to which learners adopt safe practices and a healthy lifestyle (1,2,5)
learners’ spiritual, moral, social, and cultural development (3,4)
whether learners make a positive contribution to the community. (4)

 

 

II. The quality of provision

How effective are teaching, training and learning?

Inspectors should evaluate:

how well teaching and/or training and resources promote learning, address the full range of learners’ needs and meet course or programme requirements (3,4)
the suitability and rigour of assessment in planning and monitoring learners’ progress (3)
the identification of, and provision for, additional learning needs (3)

 

and, where appropriate,

the involvement of parents and carers in their children’s learning and development. (3)

 

How well do programmes and activities meet the needs and interests of learners?

Inspectors should evaluate:

the extent to which programmes or activities match learners’ aspirations and potential, building on prior attainment and experience (3,5)
how far programmes or the curriculum meet external requirements and are responsive to local circumstances (4,5)

 

and, where appropriate,

the extent to which employers’ needs are met (5)
the extent to which enrichment activities and/or extended services contribute to learners’ enjoyment and achievement (3,4,5)
the extent to which the provision contributes to the learners’ capacity to stay safe and healthy. (1,2)

 

How well are learners guided and supported?

Inspectors should evaluate:

the care, advice, guidance and other support provided to safeguard welfare, promote personal development and achieve high standards (1,2,3)
the quality and accessibility of information, advice and guidance to learners in relation to courses and programmes, and, where applicable, career progression. (3,5)

 

 

III. Leadership and management

How effective are leadership and management in raising achievement and supporting all learners?

Inspectors should evaluate:

how effectively performance is monitored and improved through quality assurance and self-assessment
how effectively leaders and managers at all levels clearly direct improvement and promote the well-being of learners through high quality care, education and training
how well equality of opportunity is promoted and discrimination tackled so that all learners achieve their potential
the adequacy and suitability of staff, including the effectiveness of processes for recruitment and selection of staff to ensure that learners are well taught and protected
the adequacy and suitability of specialist equipment, learning resources and accommodation
how effectively and efficiently resources are deployed to achieve value for money

 

and, where appropriate,

how effectively links are made with other providers, services, employers and other organisations to promote the integration of care, education and any extended services to enhance learning and to promote well-being
how effectively governors and other supervisory boards discharge their responsibilities.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interpretation and Analysis of Common Inspection Framework

What are we seeking to achieve?

How do we achieve it?

EVIDENCE

 

(INTERPRETATION)

Sources include:

HOW WELL DO LEARNERS ACHIEVE?

Results and retention rates compare well with local and national averages

Also achievement of planned learning outcomes in non-accredited courses

DOCUMENTS:

Individual and collective learning plans

Learning agreements

 

maintenance of very high standards

Repeated evidence that a high proportion of learners progress significantly from their starting point and meet the challenges of their programmes of study

Registers

 

Analyses of retention data

 

Records of achievement

 

Analysis of added value indicates that learners make at least the progress expected of them

Learners have enriched themselves by extending their range of knowledge and skills whilst on their course, programme or project; their learning is greater than anticipated at the start of the programme – additional learning outcomes are achieved

 

Records of assessment of learners

 

IV and EV reports

 

Exam results

 

Records of individual achievements

 

Standards are consistently high across the provider’s work

Learners achieve high standards appropriate to the different types of learning, for example learning through participation in community projects

Analyses of achievement

 

DISCUSSIONS (&/or notes of discussions) with

Learners
Tutors
Managers
Workers in the local community

 

Challenging learning goals and targets are achieved

Also learning goals are meaningful for the individual learner, for example learning to use a computer in order to help their grandchild learn IT skills

 

Self assessment and review sheets

 

 

 

 

 

What are we seeking to achieve?

How do we achieve it?

EVIDENCE

 

(INTERPRETATION)

Sources include:

THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING

How effective are teaching, training and learning?

teachers:

Show knowledge, technical competence and up-to-date expertise, at a level consistent with effective teaching, training and assessment of the course of programme

Tutors are suitably qualified, experienced in and knowledgeable about their subject area. They use appropriate methods for dealing with learners from a wide range of backgrounds and for the different types of provision e.g. community intervention and outreach

 

CVs and updates

 

Staff development records

 

Tutor reviews

 

Plan effectively with clear objectives that all learners understand

Tutors relate learning activities to objectives which have been discussed and agreed with learners as part of their learning plans

 

Learning agreement

 

Discussion notes with tutor

 

Schemes of work

 

Lesson plan

 

Use methods and styles of teaching and training consistent with the aims of their programmes and learners’ personal objectives

Tutors use a range of teaching methods to build on adults’ existing experience and knowledge, helping them to extend their repertoire of learning styles

Classroom observation

 

Tutors’ evaluation of lesson plans/schemes of work

 

Learners’ evaluations

 

Analysis of learners evaluations

 

Challenge and inspire learners

Tutors motivate learners by finding ways to help them look at themselves and the world afresh

Course file notes

 

Learners’ diaries

 

Discussions with learners and tutors

 

Set, use and mark assignments in a way that helps learners to progress

Assignments and assessments reflect individuals’ learning needs and primary learning goals. Feedback is fair and constructive

 

Records of learners’ progress reviews

 

Learners’ agreements and action plans

 

IV and EV reports

 

Discussion notes – tutor/learner

 

Records of learners’ work (may include video, journal)

 

With learners, develop individual learning plans, informed by initial assessment, that are reviewed and updated regularly

Learning plans, reflect learners’ identified learning needs, interests and aspirations, as well as their prior learning. These are reviewed and updated to take account of learners’ progress. When learners participate in a programme that explores particular community issues, a learning plan devised for the whole group may be used for deriving individual learning plans

Learners’ agreements and action plans

 

Individual plans

 

Group learning plan

Use materials and teaching methods that promote equality of opportunity

Tutors encourage collaborative working relationships based on mutual respect, and sensitivity to the culture, and values of others

 

Course information sheet

 

Scheme of work

 

Lesson plan & notes

 

Student feedback

 

Journal/reflective log

 

Present material in a way that is sensitive to issues of equal opportunity

Tutors ensure that the presentation and content of learning materials positively values peoples’ different backgrounds and cultures

 

Observation

 

Discussion

 

Planning notes

 

Examples of materials and evaluation of materials

 

Learners:

 

Acquire new knowledge and skills develop ideas and increase their understanding

Learners develop their grasp of a particular subject, issue or skill; for some learners, learning will include the ability to operate effectively in their learning group or to undertake new roles in the wider community

 

Initial assessment

(may be self-assessment)

 

records of progress

 

assessment records

Understand and are competent in what they are doing how well they are progressing and what they need to do to improve

Learners regularly review their progress with their tutor, can describe what progress hay have made since the start of the programme and know what targets they aim to achieve next

 

Records of learners’ reviews

 

Discussion notes (may be tutorial notes)

 

Action planning

 

Apply effort to succeed with their work productively and make effective use of their time

 

Are stimulated and show interest in their work

Learners are absorbed in their studies. They are able to work unsupervised on agreed assignments. They organise their work carefully. They plan and carry out learning activities outside learning sessions.

Student feedback

 

Observation

 

Discussion with students

 

 

 

What are we seeking to achieve?

How do we achieve it?

EVIDENCE

 

(INTERPRETATION)

Sources include:

 

THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING

How are achievement and learning affected by resources?

There are enough qualified and experienced teaching, training and support staff matching the demands of programmes and the range of learners

The tutor/learner ratio is appropriate and there are enough suitably experienced tutors and support staff. Staff understand and are able to meet the needs of learners of all abilities and from a wide range of backgrounds. They understand the anxieties that adults may have as a result of earlier schooling, or a lack of formal education

Registers

 

Observation notes and discussion

 

Discussion with tutors and volunteers

 

CVs and updates

 

The professional development of staff contributes to their effectiveness

Staff development is available for all staff including part-time tutors and for volunteers

Staff development programme (publicity)

 

Tutor and volunteer review/appraisal notes

Specialist equipment and materials are used, including facilities which are relevant to the workplace and which meet current industrial standards

Suitable up-to-date learning materials and equipment are available and are used at all venues

Documents relating to resources and learning materials, including adaptations made

 

Observation notes

 

Course /meetings notes

 

Accommodation provides a suitable setting for good teaching, training and leaning and support for learners

Venues used serve local communities well. Accommodation is conducive to learning, irrespective of whether the provider owns the buildings used. There are suitable childcare facilities

Accommodation policies

And maintenance records

 

Childcare policies

 

Inspection records (childcare)

 

Records on use of accommodation

 

Records of notes re: renting other accommodation

 

 

 

What are we seeking to achieve?

How do we achieve it?

EVIDENCE

 

(INTERPRETATION)

Sources include:

 

THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING:

How well are learners guided and supported

Careers education and guidance are effective in guiding learners towards opportunities available to them when they have completed their studies or training

Learners receive all the guidance they need at every stage of their course, programme or project

Learners’ agreements

 

Learners’ reviews

 

Course file notes (e.g. for group guidance)

Procedures are in place for recognising poor punctuality, non-attendance and poor performance early and for taking appropriate action

Providers monitor learners’ attendance and check that they are progressing satisfactorily. They counsel those learners where there are concerns and try to help them resolve any problems they may have

Registers and analysis of attendance

 

Review of learners’ progress

 

Guidance/tutorial notes

 

Induction programmes enable learners to settle into their programmes quickly, to understand their rights and responsibilities and the demands of the course or programme

Learners are given enough information to understand what their learning programme involves and to be able to use the resources available to them

Induction notes

 

Learning agreement notes

 

Learners’ questionnaires on quality of support

 

Analyses of learners’ questionnaires

Individual learning needs are accurately diagnosed and learners receive effective additional support throughout their studies or training

All learners are given enough help and support to help them complete their course, programme or project successfully. The level and nature of support is appropriate for learners on different lengths and types of courses

Learner questionnaires on quality of support

 

Interviews with learners

 

Analyses of questionnaires

 

 

 

What are we seeking to achieve?

How do we achieve it?

EVIDENCE

 

(INTERPRETATION)

Sources include:

 

THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING

How well do the programmes and courses meet the needs and interests of learners?

Learners have the opportunity to study an appropriate range of courses or programmes, and, where appropriate, achieve suitable qualifications

Also, the timing of courses is designed to fit with adults’ other commitments e.g. shift working, carer responsibilities

Brochure/publicity leaflets with various times for study

 

Project information

 

Interview with learners

 

Analyses of learners’ views on provision

 

Interviews with staff

 

The curriculum or an individual programme of work is planned and managed effectively to provide coherence and 0progression

Learners can progress to other relevant courses and programmes, employment or more active involvement in the community

Course information leaflets

 

Publicity demonstrating progression

 

Community surveys

 

The curriculum or programmes of work are socially inclusive, ensuring equality of access and opportunities for learners

The curriculum is designed bearing in mind demographic factors such as the ethnic/racial and age profile of the local community, incidence of poverty, unemployment rates and health statistics

Strategic plans

 

Area learning plans (LEA, strategic groups

 

Local demographic data and analysis

 

Community regeneration plans

 

Learners have the opportunity to broaden their experience through a suitable variety of enrichment activities

Learners are able to enrich their lives by taking part in activities, recreational, cultural and communal, beyond the scope of their course, programme or project

Enrichment programmes

 

Project plans (incl. List of planned learning activities)

 

 

 

 

What are we seeking to achieve?

How do we achieve it?

EVIDENCE

 

(INTERPRETATION)

Sources include:

 

LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT

How effective are leadership and management in raising achievement and supporting all learners?

 

Clear direction is given through strategic objectives, targets and values that are fully understood by staff, including subcontractors and work placement providers

Staff understand the rationale for their work and know what they have to do to help learners fulfil their aspirations and be successful in their learning. Learners’ views inform developments in provision.

Interviews with:

?          Tutors

 

?          Managers

 

?          Learners

 

Demanding targets for retention, achievement, progression and employment are set and met

The same

?          Members of management groups

 

?          Elected members

 

?          Members of other local organisations

 

 

The quality assurance arrangements are systematic and informed by the views of all interested parties

Quality assurance arrangements are rigorous but designed to suit the size and scope of the provider. Learners and the local community have a voice in evaluating the quality of provision

Documents relating to the management of the provision such as::

?          Mission statements, Policy statements Strategic and operating plans

 

 

Rigorous self-assessment leads to identified priorities and challenging targets for improvement

The same

?          Agenda and minutes of meetings

 

?          Annual reports

 

 

Priorities are supported through responsible financial management

The same

?          Data from management information systems

 

 

 

Staff understand and are fully involved in the organisation’s quality assurance arrangements

All staff, including full-time and part-time tutors, voluntary and support staff understand and participate in the provider’s quality assurance procedures

Documents relating to

Quality assurance such as:

?          procedures and policy

 

?          Procedures for monitoring the quality of training and assessment

 

The information needs of managers and other staff are met and management information is used effectively to the benefit of learners

The same

?          Data on the effectiveness and efficiency of the programmes

 

?          Action plans for the improvement of provision

 

?          Statistics relating to the achievement of performance targets

 

Performance management, staff appraisal and review are effective in improving the quality of provision

Appraisal and performance management arrangements are appropriate to the size and scale of the organisation and enable staff to identify their training needs and improve their performance. A good range of staff development is available.

 

?          Questionnaires, surveys and analysis of responses

 

?          Self-assessment reports

 

There are explicit aims and values promoting equality for all that are reflected in the provider’s work

Equality of opportunity is promoted through all aspects of learning and the provider’s work e.g. in fee structures, the participation of learners from different backgrounds, achievements and progress are analysed according to learners’ backgrounds

Documents relating to the promotion of equality of opportunity, such as:

?          Publicity and marketing materials

 

?          Equal opportunities and procedures

 

 

 

 

There are effective measures to eliminate oppressive behaviour, including all forms of harassment

The provider has policies and codes of practice to counter any harassment of persons because of their gender, ethnicity, age disabilities and sexual orientation, and staff are provided with training to help them deal with such harassment

?          Monitoring and devaluation of equal opportunities data

 

?          Details of staff development activities related to equal opportunities

 

 

 

There are effective procedures for dealing with appeals and complaints

The provider responds to complaints and grievances promptly and effectively, using procedures that are understood by staff and learners

?          Statistics on recruitment, retention rates, achievements and destinations of learners, disaggregated according to learners’ gender, ethnicity and disabilities

 

 

Governors or other supervisory boards effectively oversee the provider’s strategic direction, and regularly monitor the quality of provision and their own performance

As appropriate, elected members in local authorities, governing bodies, management committees or partnership boards oversee the provider’s strategic direction, monitor quality and review their own performance regularly

?          records of complaints and remedies

?

?          data on the proportion of persons from minority groups in the local population

 

 

Efficient and effective use is made of resources

The provider subjects its running costs to regular scrutiny. It balances fee income with commitments to widening participation. Working in partnership with other organisations helps secure the cost-effective use of resources for adult learners

documents relating to financial management and the evaluation of the efficiency of use of resources, such as:

?          the partnership’s financial policies

 

?          annual financial reports

 

 

The ‘best value’ principles of comparison, challenge, consultation and competition are applied in securing resources and services

Staff make effective use of ‘best value’ information to secure resources and services at competitive rates

?          Analysis of the cost of learning

 

?          Market information on ‘best value’

 

 

All documents used are relevant, serve its purpose and in effective and efficient used. Example the ILP Individual Learning Plan  is not just document compose at the start of program but is working document that is updated regularly . Review is smart with specific aim and measurable and achievable objectives.

 

 

Evidence description and analysis

 

Evidence

Details

Responsibilities

Location

ILP

Individual learning plan divided at the start of the course with in the first four weeks.  It include: personal details of learner, Result of initial assessment learning style

How course will be delivered and details about the course

Type of assessment

Agreed and signed by the learner and teacher

Teacher and learner

Regular update on monthly basis

Two copies

1.in learer class file

2. In MIS Management Information System Dept

in learner admin file

Register

Attendance/ register sheet

Completed daily by the teacher

Teacher for marking attendance raise concern or contact learner, parent or career.

Admin for entering in the Database /Spreadsheet. there is filter for longer absence where letter  is sent home (learner address)

 

In MIS Management Information System Dept

Review

It conducted by teacher with learner on monthly or quarterly basis depending on the learner’s needs.

It review the learner performance, attendance, working toward project/qualification

Setting target for learner that are achievable measurable, specific and within time scale

Teacher and learners

 

Regularly updated

 

 

 

 

Conclusion:

 

UK Model of Quality Assurance have policy framework that place the learners at the heart of teaching and learning process with an established objectives for better quality and defined strategies that improve the education.

 

We all agree that developing policy framework may relatively be easy however implementation these policies is the harder, need time consuming, serious work and commitment from all members involved in the process.

 

The main factor in implementing the framework is having strong leadership who can raise awareness amongst the staff and work with them by involving them in the process.

 

From my own experience work life is much easier to handle if we have a clear implemented policy and procedure, we know what our mission, are where we are, and what we want to go and how to get there.

 

Comments are closed.